Thank you, Utah
It’s been 83 years since Utah gave the rest of the nation a gift that The Legal Genealogist so appreciates at this time of year.
December is always a tough month, what with all the running around for the holidays and end-of-the-year work projects.
And December this year is particularly tough with some less-frequent deadlines like — gulp! — getting my portfolio for recertification as a Certified Genealogist® submitted to the Board for Certification of Genealogists…
My major project for the portfolio is, finally, writing up a proof argument about my second great grandfather — George Washington Cottrell1 — and the evidence that ties the family man of Parker County, Texas, to the scoundrel of Colorado County.
It’s fun.
It’s exhilarating.
It’s exhausting.
And but for Utah, 83 years ago, it would be a lot harder to relax at the end of a day. Because, for some of us, relaxing can involve something more than slightly alcoholic in nature, and it was exactly 83 years ago today that Utah became the 36th state to ratify the 21st amendment to the United States Constitution. The amendment that ended Prohibition.2
Prohibition began on 17 January 1920, one year after the 18th amendment calling for the ban on “the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States” was ratified by the states.3
That amendment had passed Congress in December 1917, and was ratified when, on a single day — 16 January 1919, it was approved by North Carolina, Nebraska, Missouri, Wyoming, and — fittingly — Utah. Utah was only the 35th state to vote to enact the amendment; the state that put it over the top was Nebraska.4
From a genealogist’s standpoint, the 18th amendment was a marvel. An absolute explosion of criminal cases flooded the courts, 1500 new enforcement agents were hired by the federal government, and records were created everywhere. In my own family, I’ve found prison records of at least four cousins in Alabama for bootlegging5 and I’m sure I haven’t even scratched the surface.
Just as one example, the National Archives has a set of records called Identification Card Files of Prohibition Agents, compiled 1920 – 1925, documenting the period 1919 – 1925.6 If you need more, NARA also has a whole set of records about official corruption — payoffs from bootleggers to police and local officials — in the Seattle Washington area.7
And if that’s not enough, think of the possible local records you might find. The Denver Public Library has a scrapbook on the career of James W. Melrose, a Colorado State Prohibition Agent, kept by his daughter.8 The Western Reserve Historical Society in Ohio has records of the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union of Lake County, Ohio.9 The Library of Virginia has an entire set of records from the Virginia Prohibition Commission, set up by statute in 1916 to “the sale and use of ardent spirits.” 10
So there’s a lot to be grateful for, as a genealogist, when thinking about Prohibition.
But at the end of these long days of December, one very weary and very grateful Legal Genealogist raises a glass to Utah, and its vote 83 years ago today, on 5 December 1933, to ratify the 21st amendment: “The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.”
Thank you, Utah.
SOURCES
Note: This post is a reprise of an earlier thank you to Utah published in 2012. Image: Red wine glass by GMcGlinn, OpenClipArt.
- See Judy G. Russell, “Oh George… you stinker!,” The Legal Genealogist, posted 9 June 2012 (https://www.legalgenealogist.com/blog : accessed 4 Dec 2016). ↩
- Amendment 21, United States Constitution. ↩
- Amendment 18, United States Constitution. ↩
- Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.com), “Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” rev. 16 Nov 2016. ↩
- See generally Judy G. Russell, “Consequences of crime,” The Legal Genealogist, posted 30 Mar 2012 (https://www.legalgenealogist.com/blog : accessed 4 Dec 2016). In addition to Quitman and Ross Battles, Jeff and McKinley Battles also spent time in the same prison system for the same offenses. ↩
- Identification Card Files of Prohibition Agents, compiled 1920 – 1925, documenting the period 1919 – 1925; Records of the Internal Revenue Service, 1791-2006; Record Group 58; National Archives II, Washington, D.C. ↩
- Seattle Conspiracy (Olmstead) Investigation, 1931 – 1935; Investigative Case Files, compiled 1924 – 1933; General Records of the Department of the Treasury, 1775 – 2005; Record Group 56; National Archives, Seattle. ↩
- A. Brown, “Prohibition in Colorado,” Western History & Genealogy Blog (http://history.denverlibrary.org/blog : accessed 5 Dec 2012). ↩
- Woman’s Christian Temperance Union records, 1916-1924; Western Reserve Historical Society; Cleveland, Ohio. ↩
- Virginia Prohibition Commission Records, 1916-1934, Accession No. 42740; State Records Collection; Library of Virginia, Richmond. ↩
Thank you, Utah. thank you Thank You THANK YOU! (And an additional thank you to the liquor store that’s a couple blocks from the Salt Lake City Center Hilton – genealogists from around the country thank you every January/February!)
I wonder what percentage of people come from families were alcohol has caused a lot of drama and trauma?
I preferred to know that I’m dealing with someone that is not just being temporarily nice because they have a little buzz on or someone that becomes unpredictable and thinks that they are safe to drive.
Genealogy offers the table of contents.. Perhaps by learning from the people of the past and the present, we can help people to be well, socialize well and include music dancing and laughter without being under the influence.
Since just two drinks increases the odds of having an unplanned sexual encounter or other decisions that have lifelong consequences, we can actually improve our present and our future by studying the past and best practices for healthy relationships and dealing with people and situations that make us ill at ease before that turns into chronic diseases that cost us all.
Money doesn’t buy back what we lose.
Walking away from records that exist — even if they exist for reasons we disapprove of — is not good genealogical practice. We can disapprove of our ancestors’ actions, from the smugness of our hopefully-healthy choices today, but that doesn’t change their actions or behavior, nor does it change the utility of the records they left based on their choices in their lifetimes.
What a violent time in American history. My grandpa told me stories about bootleggers around Walnut Springs TX. One federal officer come upon this fellows still outside Glen Rose. Shot the federal man, fed him to his hogs. Bosque county was dry when I grew up there. When out hunting, ran across about 50 cases of beer. Grandpa told me do not go near there again. This was 1955.